Load Types, Normalized Loads, Input Torque Coefficient

<< Click to Display Table of Contents >>

Navigation:  General Design Information > Cam-Mechanism Design > Dynamics of Cam Mechanical Systems >

Load Types, Normalized Loads, Input Torque Coefficient

Load Types, Normalized Load Types, and Input Torques

This topic reviews:

Payload Types.

How to normalize Payload Types with coefficients:

The effect on input-torque for different Payloads Types, and how we can normalize it as the coefficient,


Terminology:

Payload, or load, is the total force, or torque, referred to the Follower-Roller bearing.

Load imposed on a cam-mechanism is also known as the duty of the mechanism.

Capacity is the ability of the mechanism to perform the duty for a specified lifetime.


tog_minusPayload: Load Types

tog_minusNormalized Loads

tog_minusPre-load Coefficient (K); Inertia Ratio (Q).

tog_minusInput Torque Coefficient

Input Torque Coefficient, (K= 1, and Q= 0 – 1)

Simple Harmonic Motion

Simple Harmonic Motion

Drive Torque Fluctuations with each Motion-Law.

It is common to use the maximum value of the Input Torque Coefficient, , when the inertia ratio,

Simple Harmonic Motion varies smoothly and gradually from a low positive peak to a moderate negative: this is a good characteristic.

However, if this motion-law is preceded or followed by a dwell, there will be a discontinuity of acceleration at the start and end of the motion, and the dynamic response may be unacceptable.

When the Inertia Ratio is 1, the input torque of the Modified-Trapezoid varies rapidly from a high positive to a low negative value at cross-over (X=0.5):

A rapid reversal of Torque is bad because the input power source (motor) reaches a high drive torque which must rapidly to high braking torque. This might cause severe overrun if the input transmission has low inertia. Over-run means the drive speed is greater than the nominal drive speed of the cam-shaft.

If the input has a low rigidity, the drive shaft will suddenly 'unwind' to reverse its direction of 'twist'. This can cause input speed-oscillation of the cam-shaft.

When the Inertia Ratio is 1, the input torque of the Cycloidal varies more gradually than the Mod-Trap motion-law , however, not as gradually as the Mod-Sine, and it also has a higher peak value than the Mod-Sine motion-law.

When the Inertia Ratio is 1, the input torque of the Mod-Sine varies gradually from positive to negative.

It varies more gradually than, and is better than, Cycloidal.

This makes the Mod-Sine very tolerant of a bad input transmission which, combined with its good dynamic response properties, is the reason for its popularity.

Mod-Trap

Mod-Trap

Cycloidal

Cycloidal

Mod-Sine

Mod-Sine

GDI-PeakTorque-Coeffs-m

This image shows the:

Peak Values of Input-Torque Coefficient against , Inertia Ratio, for each motion-law for constant loading ().

Input Torque Coefficient, Cc (K= 0–1 & Q = 0–1)

The more complex loading pattern that includes a spring load component (0<K<1) we can find that both peak output load represented by and the peak input torque, represented by are considerably reduced with low pre-load ratios.

GDI-LoadCoeffs-SimHarm
GDI-LoadCoeffs-ModTrap
GDI-LoadCoeffs-Cycloid
GDI-LoadCoeffs-ModSine